Legal Opinion
Durruthy v. Brunert
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 19, 1988PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
228 N.J. Super. 199 (1988)
549 A.2d 456
JOSE AND ESTELLA DURRUTHY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ALEXANDER BRUNERT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 14, 1988.
Decided October 19, 1988.
Before Judges GAULKIN, BILDER and R.S. COHEN.
Cesar E. Torres argued the cause for appellant (Hudson County Legal Services Corp., attorneys).
Susan B. Persky, of the Massachusetts Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondents (Persky & Persky, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, P.J.A.D.
The principal issue raised in this tenancy…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harden v. PritzertNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Fresco v. PolicastroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Couey v. SterlingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Morristown Mem. Hosp. v. WOKEM MTGE. & REALTY CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Cabrera v. MordanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anna Mae Cashin v. Marisela Bello(073215)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Faciszewski v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Dempsey v. MastropasquaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- McQueen v. BrownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Aquino Colonial Funeral Home v. PittariNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.