Legal Opinion

MacDonald v. City of Beacon

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1944PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoyne, J.

Defendant moves under subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the £< Third ” and “ Fourth ” causes of action alleged in the amended complaint upon the ground that the same fail to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The complaint contains four causes of action, the ££ First ” and “ Second ” being to recover damages for personal injuries, and the ‘ ‘ Third ’ ’ and£ ‘ Fourth ” being statutory causes of action for wrongful acts resulting in death. The present motion, directed to the latter two causes of action, is based upon the contention that no…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greco v. S. S. Kresge Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Crapo v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Barnes v. City of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Werra v. CassedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  5. In re the Estate of RademakerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelley v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Rose v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1947
  3. Hacking v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API