Legal Opinion

Riley v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

For a statement of the appellant’s petition and the facts, we accept the statement as made in his brief:

“Plaintiff alleges in his petition: That while his son, Oscar, was trying to board one of defendant’s freight trains at Thaeker-ville, Okl., for the purpose of coming to Gainesville, Tex., his foot was mashed and broken. That his said son at once sent for a physician, but that the messenger was wrongfully delayed by the crew in charge of said train, to give information as to the nature and cause of the injury, and for- that reason the physician did not reach the said Oscar for some 30 or 40…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. CappierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  4. Griswold v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. Texas Building Co. v. Drs. Albert & EdgarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Applebaum v. NemonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  2. Boyer v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Gates v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Fitzgerald v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. O. C. Whitaker Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API