Legal Opinion
Riley v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 1, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.
For a statement of the appellant’s petition and the facts, we accept the statement as made in his brief:
“Plaintiff alleges in his petition: That while his son, Oscar, was trying to board one of defendant’s freight trains at Thaeker-ville, Okl., for the purpose of coming to Gainesville, Tex., his foot was mashed and broken. That his said son at once sent for a physician, but that the messenger was wrongfully delayed by the crew in charge of said train, to give information as to the nature and cause of the injury, and for- that reason the physician did not reach the said Oscar for some 30 or 40…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. CappierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Griswold v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Texas Building Co. v. Drs. Albert & EdgarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Applebaum v. NemonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Boyer v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Gates v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Fitzgerald v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- O. C. Whitaker Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.