Legal Opinion

People v. Boyd

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1958No. Crim. 3483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

After a trial before the court without a jury, defendant was convicted of the illegal possession of narcotics. He admitted a prior conviction for the same offense. On this appeal his sole contention is that his arrest and search were illegal because made without warrants and without reasonable and probable cause.

A federal narcotics agent, Prizborowski by name, testified that on May 14,1957, he received information from an informant that defendant, whom the informant described, was engaged in the narcotics traffic. The informant stated that defendant was a runner for a notorious narcotic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. HoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Lorenzen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CedenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. People v. SwayzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. MelchorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API