State v. Brown
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Per curiam
The section of the statute in question was applicable only during a specified period of time which had lapsed when the writ of error came on for a hearing. This being so, the question raised by the exceptions has become moot. It is well settled that Courts are not required to spend time considering controversies which injure no one and which raise nothing but abstract questions for adjudication, unless a matter of great public interest is involved, or unless some other sufficient reason appears.
The appellants contend that the determination of the constitutionality of the section in question…
2Cited by21 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. NusbaumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Martin v. American Potash & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Bowker v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Mitchell v. Consolidated School District No. 201Washington Supreme Court · 1943
- Matthews v. Quinton Ex Rel. QuintonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.