Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Doyle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2006No. 41S00-0508-DI-365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER APPROVING CONDITIONAL AGREEMENT AND IMPOSING PUBLIC REPRIMAND

Come now the Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Cormission and Ricky Dean Doyle, the respondent in this case, and tender for this Court's approval a State ment of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline wherein the parties agree that the respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Low.

Facts: On May 3, 5 and 17, 2005, advertisements for respondent's law practice ran in the Franklin Daily Journal claiming specialization in several fields of law. Respondent lacked certification as a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re LoomisIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In re DoyleIndiana Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API