State v. Culp
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentBuchanan, Chief Judge
I dissent, because the hallway of an apartment building is a “public place” within the meaning of Indiana’s public intoxication statute. To conclude otherwise is to uproot centuries of statutory and common law. The great Cardozo said, “What has once been settled by a precedent will not be unsettled overnight, for certainty and uniformity are gains not lightly to be sacrificed.” 1
Our public intoxication statute is the evolutionary product of laws enacted over two thousand years ago.2 A more recent precursor of modern public intoxication laws, whether classified as statutory or common law, is a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Heichelbech v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Lewis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- State v. SowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.