Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schmidt & Erie Railroad

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1924No. Appeal, 16PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The plaintiff recovered judgment for $85 against the defendant, before a justice of the peace, for four weeks board and lodging, and issued attachment execution thereon summoning the Erie Railroad Co. as garnishee. Judgment was entered against the garnishee for wages due the defendant amounting to $41.36, under the provisions of the Act of May 8, 1876, P. L. 139. On certiorari to the common pleas the judgment against the garnishee was reversed. We sustain this action, but not for the reason advanced by the learned court below.

The Act of 1876, in our opinion, is not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seabolt v. Commissioners of Northumberland CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Henry Taylor Lumber Co. v. Carnegie InstituteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Strouse v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  5. Vulcanite Paving Co. v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. Bean, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API