Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Walsh

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut

Decided May 31, 1886Published

Motion to Remand.

1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.

This is a motion to remand to the state court. The suit in the state court was a proceeding by mandamus to compel the defendant, a citizen of Connecticut, who is judge of the probate court for the district of Berlin, to allow the plaintiff’s appeal to the superior court for the county of Hartford, from a decree of the said probate court approving the last will of C. B. Erwin, deceased. The petition and bond were filed in time, and are in proper form. The plaintiff, a citizen of Nebraska, removed the cause.

The defendant moves to remand because—

First. Circuit courts of the United States cannot,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fraser v. JennisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Bath County v. AmySupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Warner v. Pennsylvania R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1876
  4. Barney v. Globe BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1862
  5. Washington Imp. Co. v. Kansas Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API