Legal Opinion

In re the Welfare of M. M.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1997No. C4-96-1893Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant, M.M.’s guardian ad litem Connie Kirby, challenges the district court’s determination that life insurance policy proceeds are “resources attributable to the child” that must be used to reimburse Hen-nepin County (county) for the cost of M.M.’s *529care under Minn.Stat. § 260.251, subd. 1(b) (1996).

FACTS

In 1990, the district court concluded that M.M., who was seven years old at the time, was a child in need of protection or services. M.M. has been in out-of-home placement since June of 1992. In 1993, M.M.’s mother died, leaving M.M. $20,000 as the sole…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Beltrami County v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API