Stringer v. Musacchia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Spain, J. (dissenting).
We respectfully dissent, agreeing with Supreme Court’s determination that plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. To be sure, “[a] volunteer who offers his [or her] services gratuitously cannot claim the protection afforded by the ‘flat and unvarying duty’ flowing to [the] special class [of employees protected by] section 240” (Whelen v Warwick Val. Civic & Social Club, 47 NY2d 970, 971 [1979] [emphasis added], quoting Yearke v Zarcone, 57 AD2d 457, 459 [1977], lv denied 43 NY2d 643 [1977]).
Here, plaintiff, a self-employed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Whelen v. Warwick Valley Civic & Social ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ball v. Cascade Tissue Group-New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Yearke v. ZarconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Vernum v. ZilkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.