Legal Opinion
State v. Hartman
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1992No. 49S02-9211-CR-911Published
1Opinion of the Court
602 N.E.2d 1011 (1992)
STATE of Indiana, Appellant (Plaintiff below),
v.
John HARTMAN, Appellee (Defendant below).
No. 49S02-9211-CR-911.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
November 13, 1992.
Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen. of Indiana and Richard C. Webster, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellant.
Dennis E. Zahn and James H. Voyles, Indianapolis, for appellee.
ON CRIMINAL PETITION TO TRANSFER
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This controversy involves Indiana's prostitution laws, and it is best described in plain English: Can the State use the "pimp" statute to charge a prostitute with a felony for engaging in…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Park 100 Development Co. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Benjamin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. HartmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992