Legal Opinion

Holsapple v. . International Paper Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 4, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 23, 1914:, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 23, 1914:, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. The complaint alleged a cause of action, both at common law; and under the Labor Law, for injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a painter employed by the defendant, caused by a defective scaffolding. The defense was denial and contributory negligence.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Chase, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ. Dissenting on the ground that it was error as matter of law to hold that- the plank from which the plaintiff fell was a scaffold: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Collin, J.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Storrier v. . Mosier SummersNew York Court of Appeals · 1917