Gerald Ray v. Texaco, Inc., Defendants-Third Party v. Noble Drilling Corporation, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ. Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fred M. Cook v. Ray EizenmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Rowan R. Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, Inc., No. 31015, Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part ICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Edward R. BeldingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- 27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 913, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,328 United States of America v. The City of Miami, Florida v. Fraternal Order of Police, City of Miami Lodge No. 20, Kenneth R. Harrison, President, and the Miami Police Benevolent AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981