Legal Opinion

Harman v. McAfee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 8, 2010No. A09A2315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.

Joseph Harman appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment and granting Carolyn McAfee’s motion for summary judgment on her claims under a conditional guaranty and for attorney fees arid expenses of litigation. Finding no error, we affirm.

This case arose after James McAfee loaned Carter Oaks Crossing $400,000 to refinance a mortgage. Joseph Harman, as president of Carter Oaks, signed a promissory note providing that Carter Oaks would repay the amount to McAfee plus 25 percent interest in semi-annual installments beginning June 30, 1999,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Keenom v. All American Marketing (In Re Keenom)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1999
  2. Saxton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wang v. Omni Hotels Management CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API