Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Montoya

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1974No. 1158Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHendley, Judge

I disagree with and dissent from the opinions of both Judge Sutin and Judge Lopez regarding the search and seizure question. I agree that defendant was not denied his right to a speedy trial.

First, as to Judge Sutin’s opinion: Conspicuously absent from that opinion is the purpose for the inventory and return requirements. Those requirements are first to provide defense counsel access to the warrant, Fitez v. State, 9 Md.App. 137, 262 A.2d 765 (1970); and second, to protect the searched party from having his seized property stolen or misplaced by the police. State v. Cortman, 251 Or. 566, 446…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gilbert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API