Legal Opinion

Champlain v. Detroit Stamping Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Assumpsit for breach of employment contract. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

The plaintiff sues to recover upon the following contract, made between the parties, and signed by them:

*239“ This is to certify that The Detroit Stamping Company have this twenty-fifth day of March, 1885, entered into an agreement and contracted with L. E. Champlain to travel and represent them, The Detroit Stamping Company, on the road in the State of Michigan for one year, or until the twenty-fifth day of March, 1886, at a salary of nine hundred dollars ($900), and all necessary traveling expenses while on the road for the time specified: Provided, he gives the said company the full benefit of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Child v. Detroit Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API