Woodford Distilling Co. v. Remington Typewriter Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edward A. Dicker, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitch
The plaintiff (defendant in error) recovered a judgment for $260 from the defendant (plaintiff in error) for damages sustained by an alleged breach of contract in the sale of a typewriter. The statement of claim filed in the Municipal Court says that
“Plaintiff’s claim is for money had and received by the defendant as the purchase price of a typewriter on the condition and understanding that said typewriter was to be suitable for the use and purpose of the plaintiff and * * * was to be a new typewriter free of imperfections; that said typewriter was paid for by the plaintiff before it had an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Underwood v. WolfIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Kemp v. FreemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- English v. HanfordNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Cook v. LantzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
- Skinner v. MulliganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of Indiana v. Daniel Burkhartsmeier Cooperage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
- Green v. RyanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
- Brian v. H. A. Born Packers' Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917