Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Goldberger

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1956PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbraham N. Geller, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff insurance company to rescind and uppn the ground of misrepresentations and concealment of material facts in the insured’s applications for said policies. The defendants are the insured and his wife, who is the irrevocable beneficiary of the life policy here involved. The three policies *880in suit are a life insurance policy for $10,000 issued May 4, 1953; a personal accident and health policy issued November 24, 1953, and a family hospital and surgical expense policy issued November 24,1953. The action was instituted within the periods of incontestability…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Geer v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Lampke v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Tolar v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Jenkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Cherkes v. Postal Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Highlands Insurance Company v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Arcese v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Highlands Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. LelonekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Teeter v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API