Legal Opinion

State v. Thomes

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 16, 1927PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPattangall, J.

Indictment for embezzlement. General demurrer. Demurrer overruled. Exceptions taken. Right to plead anew reserved.

Indictment contains forty-two counts. Fourteen distinct acts of embezzlement are charged, each under three counts. A consideration of the first three counts covers the case, the remaining counts *231being repetitions of these three so far as legal form is concerned. The demurrer, being general, cannot be sustained if any one of the counts is sufficient.

The three counts must be considered separately.

First Count. Based on section 10, chapter 122 R. S. This count appears to contain all…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  3. State v. NolandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  4. Commonwealth v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. Edelhoff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RoweSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
  2. State v. KellisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  3. State v. BoisvertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. State v. St. ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. State v. BullSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API