Legal Opinion

Hertz Corp. v. Acting Director of the Division of Employment & Training

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 12, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

In this case we must determine whether, when more than one hundred members (employees) of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 25 (union), went on strike against the Hertz Corporation (Hertz) for six weeks in 1996, there was a “stoppage of work.” If there was no “stoppage of work” as a result of the strike, then the employees are entitled to unemployment benefits for the duration of the strike; however, if there was a “stoppage of work,” then the employees *296are not entitled to unemployment benefits for that time. G. L. c. 151 A, § 25 (b). Because we conclude that there was no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  2. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Reed National Corp. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Boguszewski v. Commissioner of Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Reed National Corp. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lourdes Medical Center v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API