Pursel v. Armstrong
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Kalamazoo. Bill in aid or execution, to avoid a deed. The facts are in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Complainants being judgment creditors of the defendant James Armstrong levied on a farm of two hundred and forty acres he had owned, but of which he and his wife, the defendant Elizabeth, had just given a deed to his son the defendant Andrew.
This bill was then filed in aid of the execution, the complainants alleging that the deed to Andrew was in fraud of creditors. The defendants answered jointly and denied the fraud and set out a statement of the transaction and claimed that Andrew was a fair purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration. Testimony was taken and the circuit judge…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Collomb v. . CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Planck v. SchermerhornNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Doak v. RunyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Walcott v. AlmyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan · 1853
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. CadyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Messmore v. HaggardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Lant v. ManleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- McKenna v. CrowleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1888
- In re: DBMP LLC, Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants, and Sander L. Esserman, in his capacity as Legal Representative for Future Asbestos Claimants, each on behalf of the estate of DBMP LLC v. CertainTeed LLC, CertainTeed Holding Corporation, and Saint-Gobain CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.