Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Witteman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1987No. C.D. 4305Published

1Opinion of the Court

108 Wn.2d 281 (1987)

737 P.2d 1268

In the Matter of the Disciplinary Proceeding Against JEFFREY M. WITTEMAN, an Attorney at Law.

No. C.D. 4305.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 4, 1987.

Leland G. Ripley, for Bar Association.

Steven W. Thayer and Kurt M. Bulmer, for respondent.

ANDERSEN, J.

FACTS OF CASE

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the respondent Jeffrey M. Witteman was charged with seven acts of misconduct (counts 1 through 7). The hearing officer found that respondent had in fact committed these alleged violations and, based thereon and on respondent's prior disciplinary record…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Goodloe; Concurrence · Utter.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against RentelWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against NelsonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SeldenWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re ZdericWashington Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API