Legal Opinion
Herbert v. Government of the Virgin Islands
District Court, Virgin Islands
Decided July 14, 2005No. Crim. App. No. 2002-135, Sup. Ct. No. F218-01PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(July 14, 2005)
Following a bench trial, appellant Bemell Herbert was found guilty of third-degree burglary in violation of title 14, section 444(1) of the Virgin Islands Code. On appeal, Herbert asserts that there was insufficient evidence for the court to find him guilty, and also that the Virgin Islands Habitual Criminals Statute, under which he was sentenced, is unconstitutionally vague. V.L CODE Ann. tit. 14, § 61. For the reasons set forth herein, we find there was sufficient evidence for the trial judge to convict Herbert and also find that the habitual offender…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Robert U. SymeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Paul G. SczubelekCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Williams, Frederico, in No. 83-3480 v. Ayala, Jorge, in No. 83-3481 v. Guadalupe, Leocadio, in No. 83-3501Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Arthur PembertonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Monsanto v. Government of the Virgin IslandsDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2009