Legal Opinion

State v. Hawes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMikoll, J.

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to CPLR 3222.

The controversy submitted for decision is whether on the stipulated facts, pursuant to EPTL 7-3.1 and Mental Hygiene Law article 43, plaintiff is entitled to a judgment declaring the inter vivos trust at issue as being void against plaintiff, a money judgment against defendants, as the cotrustees of the trust, to the extent of the value of the trust less a $1,500 burial allowance, and whether defendants must liquidate the entire trust and pay the proceeds, less $1,500 to plaintiff.

The stipulated facts are as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt Credit Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc. v. Coats & Clark, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Kinney v. KinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Planned Consumer Marketing, Inc. v. Coats & Clark, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Tursi v. St. Joseph's Sanatorium, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CoyleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Matter of Anthone v. CarloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API