Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. Babbitt
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:
The only issue raised on appeal in this case is whether the Endangered Species Act (“Act”) requires the Fish and Wildlife Service to conduct an on-site population count of birds when the currently available data are sparse and calculations of a bird species population must of necessity be based on estimates. The Act provides that the Secretary of the Interior must make decisions whether to list a species as endangered or threatened “solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Las Vegas v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
3Cited by69 opinions
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Pacific Coast Federation Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Friends of the Santa Clara v. US Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.