Legal Opinion

Overton v. City of Waterloo

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 14, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from, Black Hawk District Court. — Hon. Charles E. Ransier, Judge. Action for damages received from a fall on a sidewalk, caused by stepping into a bole in tbe walk. Trial to a jury; verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $500. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

I. No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show negligence of the city, or the amount of the verdict. Plaintiff was hurt in the daytime, about 7:30 o’clock in the morning. The defect had existed for such a length of time as to charge the city with notice. There is no complaint of the instructions.

Appellant makes two points: First, that the evidence, fails to show that plaintiff was injured because of the negligence complained of; and, second, that she was guilty of contributory negligence.

1. municipal corporation defective walks: negligence: evidence. We are of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Earl v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Taylor v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Ryan v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Downing v. Merchants National Bank of GreeneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Johnson v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Greenlee v. City of Belle PlaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API