Legal Opinion

Boyle v. Maroney

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1887PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan District Court. Action in equity to subject certain real estate to the satisfaction of two judgments obtained by plaintiff against the defendants, James and Mary E. Maroney. Judgment was entered by the circuit court in accordance with the prayer of the petition. The material facts are stated in the opinion. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

On the 8th day of November, 1876, plaintiff recovered a judgment against James and Mary E. Maroney for $500, and one against James Maroney alone, for $1,600. These judgments were rendered in an action brought by plaintiff for the recovery of damages caused by the unlawful *72sale of intoxicating liquors to her husband. The petition in the action was filed on the 10 th day of February, 1876, and the original notice was served on James Maroney on the same day, and on Mary E. Maroney on the 2d of May following. On the 1st of March, 1876, the Maroneys conveyed the real estate in question to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bridgman & Co. v. McKissickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  2. Welch v. BatternSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Brier v. Traders' National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Goll & Frank Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Miller Co. v. MeloneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  5. Chader v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API