Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mummert v. Grant

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1929No. 26207Published

1DissentEberly, J.

In this case I find myself unable to assent to the disposition made by this court of the matters involved in this case. I have no quarrel with the principle announced in the syllabus, but my sense of public duty impels me to protest against the exactions imposed upon the redemptors in this case as wholly' unauthorized by law.

As preliminary to the discussion, it is suggested that, in addition to the facts recited in the opinion, it is undisputed that Truesdale, the purchaser at the foreclosure sale, was *655not a party plaintiff, nor had he any interest in the decree of foreclosure under which the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swearingen v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Trompen v. HammondNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lincoln Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Thesing v. WestergrenNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Citizens Bank of Stanton v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API