Legal Opinion

Rorbach v. Crossett

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Livingston county. Action by John Rorbaqli against Lloyd W. Crossett for rent. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, made on the judge’s minutes, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

This action was brought to recover for one year’s rent and interest, claimed to be due from the defendant, a tenant, to the plaintiff, as his landlord. The complaint in substance shows that on or about February 1, 1881, by an instrument in writing, made and executed in duplicate, the plaintiff leased to the defendant certain premises for the term of three years from April 1, 1881; that the defendant entered under said lease April 1,1881, and from that time, and with the acquiescence of the- plaintiff, and without any other lease or agreement, except o's hereinafter stated, continued in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Ludington v. GarlockNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Park v. CastleNew York Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herter v. MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Vosburgh v. CornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API