Roberts v. Costanza
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLS, Chief Judge.
Although no pleadings or evidence was adduced at the post decretal hearing concerning this matter, the principal question presented by this interlocutory appeal is that the court erred in changing the date of termination of child support. We agree and reverse.
The parties were divorced in June of 1965, with the mother (appellant) gaining custody of the two boys and the father (appellee) ordered to provide monthly support of $125.00 for each child until they reached the age of twenty-one years and for one year thereafter if enrolled in a college or university. The final…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Teta v. TetaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Buchanan v. Gulf Life Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- St. Joe Paper Co. v. ConnellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974