Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 28, 1995No. 14-94-00413-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDELMAN, Justice.

In this wrongful death and survivorship case, Lawson and Carolyn Wooten, individually and as representatives of the Estate of Lee Weston Wooten (collectively, the “Wootens”) appeal a take-nothing’ judgment entered in favor of Southern Pacific Transportation Company and Leslie Willard (collectively, “Southern Pacific”) on the grounds that (1) a juror was biased, (2) counsel engaged in improper and incurable jury argument, (3) challenges for cause were refused, and (4) there were conflicting answers to jury questions. We affirm.

Lee Wooten was struck by a train and killed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. ReeseTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Pennzoil, Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. International Armament Corp. v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Udolf v. Plan & Zoning Commission of West HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Hallett v. Houston Northwest Medical CenterTexas Supreme Court · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rosell v. Central West Motor Stages, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  2. Strauss v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. Mason v. Our Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Church, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. Lincicome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  5. Ford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API