Legal Opinion

Commodity Credit Corp. v. Petaluma & Santa Rosa R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1951No. 12427Published

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The case at bar presents a difficult question of tariff construction. It was decided in favor of the plaintiff railroad company by the court below. 83 F.Supp. 639. Commodity Credit Corporation, the defendant,, has appealed.

On April 11, 1944 Commodity purchased' eight carloads of wheat from the Alberta Wheat Pool. We will use one of the cars, viz., L. & N. car No. 10913, as an example. 1 This car was shipped by the Pool via Canadian Pacific Railway Company, the Pool paying the charges for the first leg of the trip, Commodity paying for the balance of the journey. On the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petaluma & Santa Rosa R. Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API