Legal Opinion

Randle v. Naugle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1927No. 2065PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalthall, J.

Mrs. Emma Randle, a single woman, brought this suit against Key M. Naugle and Fred C. Herbst, the latter doing a building and construction business under the name of “Herbst Construction Company,” to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her in falling into a thole or excavation in a sidewalk on a .street in the city of Dallas. S. D. Mob-ley was later vouched in as a defendant by Herbst and Naugle; Mobley having subcon tracted to put down the new cement sidewalk involved in the controversy.

We will refer to Mrs. Randle as plaintiff and to appellees as defendants, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Kampmann v. RothwellTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Cameron Mill & Elevator Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Cortimeglia v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Browder v. Memphis Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carolyn Nota Alexander, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Kraus v. Alamo National Bank of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Classen v. BenferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Glenda Lathers v. Penguin Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Cage v. CreedCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API