Degale-Selier v. Preferred Management & Leasing Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“A person may be deemed to have more than one employer for purposes of the Workers’ Compensation Law, a general employer and a special employer” (Schramm v Cold Spring Harbor Lab., 17 AD3d 661, 662 [2005]; see Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557 [1991]). Where “the facts . . . demonstrate the plaintiffs dual employment status, whether the relationship between two corporate entities is that of joint ventures, parent and subsidiary, corporate affiliates, or general and special employers, immunity will be extended to all the plaintiffs employers where the plaintiff has accepted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Schramm v. Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kramer v. NAB Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Levine v. PontiacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- O'Hurley-Pitts v. Diocese of Rock-Ville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Samuel v. Fourth Avenue Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Slikas v. Cyclone Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gonzalez v. Woodbourne Arboretum, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Alfonso v. Pacific Classon Realty, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Weitz v. Anzek Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.