Legal Opinion

Singletary v. Fischer

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided September 10, 2003No. 01-CV-08016; No. 03-MISC-0066PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*213CORRECTED MEMORANDUM and ORDER

WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge.

The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is stayed to permit petitioner to exhaust, if possible, any state claim for inadequate counsel or involuntariness of his admissions. [The writ was ultimately granted. See Singletary v. Fischer, 365 F.Supp.2d 328 (E.D.N.Y. 2005).] No hearing on this matter is necessary at this time. This memorandum briefly addresses petitioner’s claims.

I. Facts and Procedural History

This petition was filed on November 11, 2001. Petitioner (sometimes referred to as defendant or appellant) makes the following…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Singletary v. FischerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  2. Bonds v. KeyserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  3. Bonds v. KeyserDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
  4. Gunn v. AnnucciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  5. Harris v. Great MeadowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API