State v. Hull
Oregon Supreme Court
From Baker : Robert Eaiun, Judge. Fred. Hull and Earl Wheeler were convicted of larceny, and appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
The defendants, Hull and Wheeler, were jointly indicted, but separately tried and convicted of the crime of larceny. Each appealed, and‘their respective appeals were heard and tried together in this court as one case, and will be so considered. The important question presented is whether the trial court erred in refusing to direct an acquittal, on the ground that the properly alleged to have been stolen was taken with the consent and co-operation and assistance of the owner, through an agent employed for that purpose.
The facts, as they appear from the record, are that on September 7, 1897,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Connor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- State v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Firemen's Insurance v. Appleton Paper & Pulp Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. NeelyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Hagan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1943
- Rider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- State v. MehozonekOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.