Legal Opinion
Harris v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided April 2, 1957No. 4 Div. 319PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
Gome Harris was indicted by the grand jury of Russell County for possessing a still contrary to Code 1940, Title 29, § 131. The court after the jury’s verdict adjudged the defendant guilty of possessing a still and sentenced him to two years in the penitentiary.
The trial judge summed up the case to the jury, so far as the facts go, as follows:
“The State contends that they went down here and found this man with a truck that was bogged down, and about 60 or 70 feet from this place, there was a still. And the truck had eight sacks of sugar on it and a sack of shorts, and when the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Bonner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Price v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Leoni v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rushing v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Brazell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Saylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965