Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1957No. 4 Div. 319PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

Gome Harris was indicted by the grand jury of Russell County for possessing a still contrary to Code 1940, Title 29, § 131. The court after the jury’s verdict adjudged the defendant guilty of possessing a still and sentenced him to two years in the penitentiary.

The trial judge summed up the case to the jury, so far as the facts go, as follows:

“The State contends that they went down here and found this man with a truck that was bogged down, and about 60 or 70 feet from this place, there was a still. And the truck had eight sacks of sugar on it and a sack of shorts, and when the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. Bonner v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Price v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. Leoni v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1870

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rushing v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Brazell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Saylor v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API