Legal Opinion

Gieseking v. Schafer

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided August 13, 1987No. 86-4636-CV-C-5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SCOTT O. WRIGHT, Chief Judge.

Before the Court are the Federal and State defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment as to all counts of plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. For the following reasons, the Court concludes that plaintiffs’ claims under the Rehabilitation Act and the due process clause must be dismissed. However, defendants’ motion to dismiss as to the remaining claims must be denied.

Factual Background

Plaintiffs bring this action individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(2) of the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Martin v. VoinovichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  2. Caroline C. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1996
  3. Matter of WMMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Re Application of Noel for Discharge HearingCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  5. In re W.M.Montana Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API