Legal Opinion

A. S. Abell Co. v. Kirby

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 19, 1962No. [No. 42, September Term, 1961.]PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The A. S. Abell Company, publisher of The Sunpapers, appealed from the substantial judgment that followed the jury’s verdict against it and in favor of the appellee, Kirby, in his suit for defamation. The defense was that the editorial complained of, in which Kirby was called “infamous,” was fair comment on a matter of public interest. The principal reliance on appeal is that the trial judge erred when he made the issue, of fair comment vel non turn on whether the facts stated or referred to in the editorial formed a sound basis for the charge that Kirby was infamous. It is claimed he erred…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Burt v. Advertiser Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Washington Times Co. v. BonnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  3. Hubbard v. AllynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Leers v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Foley v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Piscatelli v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Kapiloff v. DunnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n v. BreslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Peroutka v. StrengCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API