Legal Opinion

Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance v. Prather

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 2, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 2634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a diversity action for a declaratory judgment* 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1), (c). The defendant Mr. Ronald Elkins, by his next friend and guardian First Peoples Bank of Johnson City, Tennessee, has moved for a summary judgment, Rule 56(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Insurance Company (Federated) has also moved for a summary judgment, Rule 56(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

It is clear from the pleadings, depositions and affidavits on file that Mr. Elkins was riding as a guest…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stovall v. New York Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Henry S. Cram v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd., Robert S. Wahab, Jr. v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. Lau Ah Yew v. John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. American Automobile Insurance v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Moore v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. WinsteadDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API