Legal Opinion

Soderburg v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 20, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. Action for damages caused by a nuisance. From a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWithrow, J.

I. Plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon .an alleged nuisance maintained by the defendant, caused by smoke, soot, and gas coming from the defendant’s premises to the residence of the plaintiff, which is near by, to his injury. The plaintiff states that the defendant has erected and used and is continuing to use power houses, repair shops, roundhouses, boiler shops, coal chutes and ash pits at the base of a bluff about three hundred feet to the south and east of plaintiff’s residence; that when first erected but few of defendant’s locomotives were coaled, fired, and cared for on said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bowman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. McGill v. Pintsch Compressing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Wylie v. ElwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Vogt v. City of GrinnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Hine v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Higgins v. Decorah Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Abbott v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Cary-Platt v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  5. Pauly v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API