Legal Opinion
Eastman v. United States
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided June 30, 1966No. IP 64-C-90, IP 65-C-181PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DILLIN, District Judge.
The above related causes of action, heretofore consolidated for trial, were tried by the Court without the intervention of a jury. The Court having considered all of the evidence, and the post trial briefs of the respective parties, and being duly advised, expresses its findings of fact and conclusions of law in this written opinion, pursuant to Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.
On May 28, 1963, one Harold William Brown was an employee of the United States Government. On such date, he was operating an automobile owned by him on government business arising out of and in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Irvin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1957
- United States v. James S. Myers, Individually and for His Wife, Harriet Myers, and as Natural Guardian and Next Friend of James Myers, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Barker v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1964
- Patterson v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1964
- Vaughn v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. HigginbothamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies v. Ex-Cell-O Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
- Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Sherwood Brands, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Continental Cas. Co. v. United Pacific Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Scottsdale Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.