Gordon v. Gordon

(after stating the facts as above). By the first and second assignments of error it is insisted that the court erred in rendering judgment in favor of the appel-lees for the 50 acres of land, “because the undisputed testimony shows that the defendants had lived on the premises for over 30 years and had asserted claim thereto against the entire world, and the same had been nuder fence for over 10 years.”

The evidence does show that the defendant Frances London and her son Cull Gordon have lived on the premises for about 30 years to the time of the suit, and that the 50 acres had been fenced for…