Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matter of Bogart (Commr. of Labor)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 2016No. 519947Published

1DissentRose, J.

We respectfully dissent. Given the restrictions that LaValle Transportation, Inc. placed upon claimant in this case and this Court’s recent affirmances in two cases involving similar restrictions (see Matter of Harold [Leonard’s Transp. — Commissioner of Labor], 133 AD3d 1069 [2015], lv dismissed 26 NY3d 1136 [2016]; Matter of Wilder [RB Humphreys Inc. — Commissioner of Labor], 133 AD3d 1073 [2015]), we disagree with the majority’s reversal of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s decisions regarding claimant. Here, as to claimant, the indicia of control retained by LaValle are numerous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Youngman (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. In re the Claim of DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Matter of Harold (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. In re Claim of DuffyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Matter of Wilder (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API