Legal Opinion

Croskey v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 1991No. 89-1345PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Senior Judge:

Petitioner Leneva E. Croskey seeks review of the decision of the District of Columbia Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board that her psychological disability was not incurred in the performance of duty.1 We affirm.

Croskey, while working as an officer with the Metropolitan Police Department, was shot in the leg during a shootout between police and drug dealers. Croskey recovered from the injury, but when she returned to work she began to suffer a post-traumatic stress disorder that made her restless and depressed. Following a hearing, the Board concluded…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Nader v. De ToledanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Baumgartner v. Police & Firemen's Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Allen v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Dowd v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Sinobia Newell-Brinkley v. Diana Haines WaltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Beckman v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Britton v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters' Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Long v. District of Columbia Police & Firefighters Retirement & Relief BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API