Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Hurst
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 19, 1948No. 325MPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner moves for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel compliance with our mandate *148issued January 12, 1948, in Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U. S. 631. We there said:
“The petitioner is entitled to secure legal education afforded by a state institution. To this time, it has been denied her although during the same period many white applicants have been afforded legal education by the State. The State must provide it for her in conformity with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and provide it as soon as it does for applicants of any other group.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Missouri Ex Rel. Gaines v. CanadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sweatt v. PainterSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Browder v. GayleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1956
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Carter v. School Board of Arlington County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Carr v. Corning, Superintendent of Public Schools Browne Junior High School Parent-Teacher Ass'n v. MagdeburgerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.