Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Tidwell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1961No. 38614PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jordan, Judge.

“Where delay of the clerk of the trial court to prepare and certify a transcript of the record within the time prescribed by statute is not caused by his own laches, but by the active interposition of counsel for the plaintiff in error. . . . the writ of error will be dismissed. Farrar v. Oglesby, 84 Ga. 188 (11 S. E. 133).” Black v. Columbia Phonograph Co., 52 Ga. App. 48 (182 S. E. 73). See Article 6, Section 2, Paragraph 5 of the Constitution of 1945 (Code Ann. § 2-3705); Butler v. Rich’s Inc., 81 Ga. App. 20 (57 S. E. 2d 710).

Decided April 5, 1961 Rehearing denied April 25,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farrar v. OglesbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Black v. Columbia Phonograph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Butler v. RICH'S INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  4. Fellows v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. George v. American Credit Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  2. Pickett v. PaineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Smith v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  4. Wallace v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Wallace v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API