Legal Opinion

Crane Johnson Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided December 8, 1938No. Docket No. 91809Published

1. A corporation prohibited by state law from declaring dividends because of an existing deficit held not entitled to deduction in computation of the undistributed profits surtax under the Revenue Act of 1936. 2. Undistributed profits surtax held constitutional.

1Opinion of the Court

CRANE JOHNSON COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Crane Johnson Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 91809.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

38 B.T.A. 1355; 1938 BTA LEXIS 752;

December 8, 1938, Promulgated

1. A corporation prohibited by state law from declaring dividends because of an existing deficit held not entitled to deduction in computation of the undistributed profits surtax under the Revenue Act of 1936.

2. Undistributed profits surtax held constitutional.

John A. Cull, C.P.A., for the petitioner.

W. R. Lansford, Esq., for the respondent.

OPPER

OPINION.

OPPER: This…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API