Legal Opinion
Woodzicka v. Artifex Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided November 6, 1998No. 94-C-1379PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 41(a)(2) MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
CALLAHAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Background
This action was commenced on December 19, 1994, when the plaintiffs, David Woodzic-ka (“Woodzicka”) and Jason Nelson (“Nelson”), filed a complaint in this district asserting a host of claims against the defendant, Artifex Limited (“Artifex”). The plaintiffs’ claims stem from each of them having allegedly incurred damages from the spinal fixa tion systems utilizing pedicle screws, which were implanted posteriorly into the vertebrae of their spines. Their complaint…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Betty v. Pace, as Administratrix of the Estate of Floyd J. Pace, Jr., Deceased v. Southern Express CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- Dennis Marlow and Provest, Incorporated, Formerly Known as Dennis Marlow, Incorporated v. Winston & Strawn, a Partnership, and Leslie A. BlauCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Tyco Laboratories, Inc. v. Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Burton Stern, Bankrupt. Burton Stern, Bankrupt v. Ralph Barnett and Phillip Liss, Objecting-Creditors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Richard W. Brown v. Local 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shady Records, Inc. v. Source Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Gonzales v. City of Topeka KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Ruth v. Purdue Pharma Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004